NATO Is Rebuilding Itself With a Lot Less America
At NATO's summit in Ankara, the alliance began planning for a future in which the US does far less. Washington intends to pull back forces and equipment from Europe, including submarines, fighter jets and drones, leaving European members to fill the gap. Germany, Poland and the Baltic states are ramping up spending fast.
At NATO's summit in Ankara, the alliance began planning for a future in which the US does far less. Washington intends to pull back forces and equipment from Europe, including submarines, fighter jets and drones, leaving European members to fill the gap. Germany, Poland and the Baltic states are ramping up spending fast.
This is a structural change, not a spat. For decades, European defense rested on the assumption that American forces, intelligence and firepower would be there if needed, and much of the continent's military planning was built around that certainty. A deliberate US drawdown forces Europe to rebuild capabilities it let atrophy. The safety net is being pulled back.
The gaps are specific and expensive. The assets the US is reducing, submarines, advanced aircraft, drones and the logistics that support them, are precisely the ones Europe is weakest in, and they take years and enormous sums to replace. This is not about troop numbers, it is about the high-end capability that makes a modern military credible. Filling that hole is a decade-long project.
Some countries are moving faster than others. Germany, Poland and the Baltic states, closest to the Russian threat and most alarmed by it, are raising defense budgets sharply and buying equipment at pace, while others move slowly. That gap between the urgent and the complacent is one of NATO's real weaknesses. The alliance is only as strong as its slowest member.
The honest caveat is that money is not capability. Announcing higher budgets is easy, but building submarines, training crews and creating industrial capacity takes years, and Europe's defense industry cannot simply scale overnight. There is also the risk that a weaker, more divided NATO invites the very aggression it exists to deter. Rearming is slow, and adversaries do not wait.
So Europe is being handed a bill it has avoided for a generation, and it is starting to pay. A US drawdown, an alliance replanning itself, and defense budgets climbing across the continent. For seventy years, European defense effectively meant American defense. Ankara was the summit where that assumption quietly ended.